Skip to main content

OTS Academia Library

The OTS Academia Library

The OTS Academia Library

Published papers & shared tips and tricks for orthopaedic trauma surgery.  Scroll through or use the search options to find relevant papers.  The data range is from when the papers were added to the library, not published. 

Orth Categories
Date filter
Search
Sort

Short or Long Antibiotic Regimes in Orthopaedics (SOLARIO)

A randomised controlled open-label non-inferiority trial of duration of systemic antibiotics in adults with orthopaedic infection treated operatively with local antibiotic therapy Discussion: This study aims to assess a treatment strategy that may enable the reduction of systemic antibiotic use for patients with orthopaedic infection. If this strategy is non-inferior, this will be to the advantage of patients and contribute to antimicrobial stewardship.

Effect of Incisional Negative PressureWound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Deep Surgical Site Infection After Surgery for Lower Limb Fractures Associated With Major Trauma

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients who underwent surgery for major trauma–related lower limb fractures, use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy, compared with standard wound dressing, resulted in no significant difference in the rate of deep surgical site infection. The findings do not support the use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy in this setting, although the event rate at 30 days was lower than expected.

Modern Management of Severe Open Fractures of the Extremities The Role of the Induced Membrane Technique

Abstract The administration of antibiotics, revascularization, effective initial debridement, stabilization, and dead-space management are important time-dependent, acute actions. ➢ Following the adequate resuscitation of the patient and the local soft tissues, the first stage of the Masquelet technique is performed together with the definitive coverage of the soft-tissue defect. ➢ The optimal time for the second stage (grafting of the bone defect) depends on the progress of the soft-tissue reconstruction and the overall state of the patient. It is usually at 6 to 14 weeks. ➢ Bone graft involves cancellous autograft; depending on the volume of the defect, it can be acquired using different donor sites and methods and can be combined with cancellous allograft, bone substitutes, bone marrow aspirate, and inductive molecules. ➢ Bone healing is independent of the size of the defect, assuming that revascularization of the graft material has not been disturbed. ➢ The development of signs of a fracture-related infection in the clinical setting of a severe open fracture dictates surgical treatment and pathogen-specific antibiotics, debridement of the membrane and the surrounding soft tissues, and reinitiation of the staged process of limb salvage. ➢ The results of staged management of severe open fractures with bone defects are reproducible and good.

Fracture liaison service (FLS) is associated with lower subsequent fragility fracture risk and mortality: NoFRACT (the Norwegian capture the fracture initiative)

Summary: Subsequent fracture rates and associated mortality were compared before and after the introduction of fracture liaison service (FLS). In 100,198 women and men, FLS was associated with 13% and 10% lower risk of subsequent fragility fractures and 18% and 15% lower mortality. The study suggests that FLS may prevent fractures. Purpose: Efficient fracture prevention strategies are warranted to control the global fracture burden. We investigated the effect of a standardized fracture liaison service (FLS) intervention on subsequent fracture risk and mortality. Methods: The NoFRACT study was designed as a multicenter, pragmatic, register-supported, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. The FLS intervention was introduced in three clusters with 4-month intervals starting May 2015 through December 2018 and included evaluation of osteoporosis and treatment in patients over 50 years with a low-energy fracture. Based on data from the Norwegian Patient Registry, patients with index fractures were assigned to the control period (2011–2015) or intervention period (2015–2018) depending on the time of fracture. Rates of subsequent fragility fractures (distal forearm, proximal humerus, or hip) and all-cause mortality were calculated. Results: A total of 100,198 patients (mean age 69.6 years) suffered an index fracture of any type. During a maximum followup of 4.7 years, 11% (6948) of the women and 6% (2014) of the men experienced a subsequent fragility fracture, and 20% (14,324) of the women and 22% (8,326) of the men died. FLS was associated with 13% lower subsequent fragility fracture risk in women (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.83–0.92) and 10% in men (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81–0.99) and 18% lower mortality in women (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.79–0.86) and 15% in men (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81–0.89). Conclusion: A standardized FLS intervention was associated

Intramedullary Nailing vs Sliding Hip Screwin Trochanteric Fracture Management The INSITE Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE Fractures of the hip have devastating effects on function and quality of life. Intramedullary nails (IMN) are the dominant implant choice for the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip. Higher costs of IMNs and inconclusive benefit in comparison with sliding hip screws (SHSs) convey the need for definitive evidence. OBJECTIVE To compare 1-year outcomes of patients with trochanteric fractures treated with the IMN vs an SHS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 25 international sites across 12 countries. Participants included ambulatory patients aged 18 years and older with low-energy trochanteric (AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA] type 31-A1 or 31-A2) fractures. Patient recruitment occurred between January 2012 and January 2016, and patients were followed up for 52 weeks (primary end point). Follow-up was completed

Epidemiology & management of complex ankle fractures in the United Kingdom: A multicentre cohort study

Background: Patient factors are known to contribute to decision making and treatment of ankle fractures. The presence of poor baseline mobility, diabetes, neuropathy, alcoholism, cognitive impairment, inflammatory arthritis or polytrauma can result in a higher risk of failure or complications. Limited evidence is available on the optimum management for this challenging cohort of patients herein described as complex ankle fractures. This UK multicentre study assessed and evaluated the epidemiology of ankle fractures complicated by significant comorbidity and patient factors and use of specialist surgical techniques such as hindfoot nails (HFN) / tibiotalarcalcaneal (TCC) nails and enhanced open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Patients and Methods: A UK-wide collaborative study was performed of adult distal AO43/AO44 fractures, associated with 1 or more of the patient factors listed above. Primary outcomes included patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical technique and implants. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and early post-operative weight bearing instructions. Statistical analysis was performed to assess patient and fracture characteristics on outcome, including propensity matching. Results: One-thousand three hundred and sixty patients, with at least one of the above complex factors, from 56 centres were included with a mean age of 53.1 years. 90.2% (1227) patients underwent primary fixation which included 78.9% (1073) standard open reduction internal fixations (ORIF), 3.25% (43) extended ORIF and 8.1% (111) primary HFN / TCC. Overall wound complications and thromboembolic events were similar in the hindfoot nail group and the ORIF group (11.7% vs 10.7%). Wound complications were greater in diabetic patients versus non-diabetic patients independent of fixation method (15.8% vs 9.0%). After propensity matching for comorbidities and fracture type, overall complications were lower in the hindfoot nail (11.8%) and extended ORIF groups (16.7%), than the standard ORIF group (18.6%). Conclusion: Only a minority of complex ankle fractures are treated with specialised techniques (HFN/TCC or extended ORIF). Though more commonly used in older and frail patients their perceived advantages are often negated by a reluctance to bear weight early. These techniques demonstrated a better complication profile to standard ORIF but hindfoot nail with joint preparation for fusion was associated with more complications than hindfoot nail for fixation.

Donor site morbidity – how invasive is the free latissimus dorsi flap?

LDM flap surgery leads to a significant impairment of the strength and ROM in the shoulder joint. Moreover, the donor morbidity must be differentiated with regard to handedness: harvest on the non-dominant side potentiates the already existing difference in strength and ROM. Conversely, if the harvest takes place on the dominant side of the patient, this difference is diminished.

Hip fracture: management

This guideline covers managing hip fracture in adults. It aims to improve care from the time people aged 18 and over are admitted to hospital through to when they return to the community. Recommendations emphasise the importance of early surgery and coordinating care through a multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Programme to help people recover faster and regain their mobility.